As the Senate grapples with the stimulus plan, especially the proposed major changes to the healthcare system, the question arises: what to do about healthcare? To begin, this question hinges upon the answers to two basic, philosophical questions: is healthcare a right; and is healthcare something that is good, and thus worthy to be discussed alongside economics and foreign policy? In this post, I’ll be looking at the former question, is healthcare a right?
We Americans love the concept of “rights”. Everything, we say, is a right: free speech, freedom of religion, freedom from religion, sexuality, abortion, and now, to that list, we want to add healthcare. Is healthcare really a right? Should we amend the constitution to say, “life, liberty, and the pursuit of antibiotics for my viral cold”? True, one may extrapolate that one has a right to healthcare because it is a part of life, which according to the Declaration, is an inalienable right. However, I ask, does that truly fit within the concept of “rights”? The rights spoken of in the constitution are better understood as freedoms, rather than obligations. If we actually read the Constitution and Bill of Rights, we’ll see that the rights given to us are not in the positive, but rather in the negative; our “rights” are really restrictions placed on the formation of restrictions. So, we have a freedom from restrictions placed on gatherings; we have a freedom from restrictions placed on speech; we have a freedom from excessive rules concerning the bearing of arms. When understood this way, the concept of “healthcare as a basic right” falls apart. Rather than “we have a right to healthcare”, it would read, “Congress shall make no law pertaining to the healthcare system.” When viewed this way, the American healthcare system as a whole begins to look quite dubious. However, this will never be given voice by public officials, because it is by very nature, odious to our American sensibilities. We want our cake, and fast-food, cigarettes, alcohol, promiscuous sex, and laziness, and our healthcare too. The idea of connecting our choices now to later health consequences escapes our minds, and yet we demand healthcare, because it is our “right”. And, by placing it in the category as a “right”, we effectively remove it from the field of debate. No one debates a “right”, because that is what makes America what it is. If healthcare is a right, it has power, it has might, and it is untouchable.
Conservatives and liberals alike have fallen under this concept’s tyranny, for anything that has unquestionable power is tyrannical. This is evidenced by debating the efficacy of universal healthcare and socialized medicine, rather than the far more basic question of healthcare’s connection to our everyday lives and choices, and its moral status. By not asking these basic questions, we affirm this supposed “right’s” power over us. By assigning healthcare the status of “right”, we assume deep, powerful, and wide-sweeping obligations to the protection and upholding of that right. We lose the nuances and realities of justice, equality, and fairness that a right removes from any idea. If healthcare is a right, every person deserves their full portion of healthcare. However, that is impossible, untenable, and impractical, and so, healthcare cannot be a right. It cannot be a right in the constitutional sense, in the moral sense, or in the practical sense. Healthcare is not a right, and it certainly does not belong in an economic stimulus plan.
Posted in Politics
Tags: Healthcare Policy